The world of football is currently facing a critical moment. FIFA President Gianni Infantino is under scrutiny, and the 2026 World Cup is at stake. The core of the issue? His public endorsement of former US President Donald Trump, which has ignited a firestorm of ethical concerns. But here’s where it gets controversial: this seemingly simple act has brought FIFA’s political neutrality into question, threatening the very integrity of the sport’s biggest event.
This controversy stems from Infantino’s open support for Trump’s political agenda during the America Business Forum in Miami. He praised the former US leader’s program, stating it “looks pretty good” and urging support. This bold move directly clashes with FIFA’s strict ethical guidelines, which demand political neutrality from its officials.
So, what’s the problem? FIFA’s Code of Ethics, specifically Article 15, mandates that officials remain politically neutral. Former FIFA Governance Committee Chairman Miguel Maduro has pointed out that Infantino’s endorsement is a clear violation. He argues that Infantino didn’t just acknowledge the election’s legitimacy but actively promoted a political program. Despite calls for an investigation, the FIFA Ethics Committee has remained silent, leaving many wondering about the next steps.
Infantino’s defense centers on respecting the democratic process. However, critics argue that his statement goes beyond acknowledging the election results and constitutes political advocacy. And this is the part most people miss: his actions directly contradict his own recent statements emphasizing the need to protect the political neutrality of sport in a world of division.
This isn’t an isolated incident. Infantino’s endorsement is the latest in a series of events highlighting his close relationship with the former US leader. Their friendship, cultivated through White House visits and public appearances, has raised eyebrows. Infantino has even referred to the former US leader as a “great friend.”
Adding fuel to the fire, the global player union, FIFPRO, has criticized Infantino’s leadership, accusing him of focusing on profitability and adopting an autocratic style. They’ve even gone as far as to label him as “the man who thinks he’s god.”
The situation gets even more complex with the announcement of the “FIFA Peace Prize – Football Unites the World.” This new annual award, set to be presented at the World Cup Final Draw in Washington, D.C., has sparked concern. The possibility of the former US leader being the inaugural recipient is seen as a further confirmation of their political alliance, undermining FIFA’s neutrality.
But wait, there’s more. The potential impact on host nation sovereignty is another significant concern. The former US leader suggested that Infantino would support moving World Cup games if security conditions were deemed unsafe. However, this threat was met with a strong rebuttal from within FIFA’s hierarchy, with officials emphasizing FIFA’s ultimate authority.
The timing of this controversy is particularly sensitive with the 2026 World Cup approaching. The tournament’s success depends on a global image of unity, and the perception of political bias could lead to protests and diminish the celebratory atmosphere. The issue has even caused friction at the local level, with Boston Mayor Michelle Wu criticizing the former US leader’s comments. Norwegian national team coach Ståle Solbakken summed it up perfectly, stating that political news distracts from the game itself.
In conclusion: FIFA must address this breach of neutrality to protect the unifying spirit of its pinnacle tournament. Do you think FIFA will take the necessary steps to ensure its leader is seen as a steward for all member associations, or will this controversy continue to cast a shadow over the sport? Share your thoughts in the comments below!